Indeed, whether or not Elena Kagan self-identifies as a lesbian, she has proven herself a radical anti-military, pro-homosexual ideologue and activist. To pick up where Senator Feinstein left off, which is an excellent question, and this country needs to discuss this openly and, quite frankly, somewhat behind closed doors. What's unclear to me is whether you agree with Justice Marshall's view of the role of the court in constitutional interpretation. Search Most popular on msnbc. And the public needs to know whether her personal views will trump the Constitution, as they appeared to do when she banned military recruiters from campus.
Kagan Confirmation Hearing, Day 3, Part 3
Not just a leftist pervert, but a drunk, emotionally unstable leftist pervert. Studies have shown that 42 percent to 68 percent of LGBT individuals report experiencing employment discrimination Badgett, ; Fassinger, So we had to seize upon this. Senator [R] Arizona Patrick J. Gimme ten minutes in the sack with her, I'd straighten her out. She would be the youngest member on the current court and the first justice in nearly four decades without any prior judicial experience. If they drop the antisemitism bomb on you, you'll need one
PBS "Newshour" - Transcript - Public Statements - The Voter's Self Defense System - Vote Smart
But, Dean Kagan, do you agree with me that under normal criminal law, there is no process to hold someone indefinitely without trail under domestic criminal law? Last edited by MilTan on Mon May 10, 3: Sexual minority status and self-rated health: I wish that weren't the case, though. But it's worth looking beyond this personal eco-foul to examine Kagan's broader record on environmental and climate issues. She's a Presidential power uber alles type, and I don't think the SCOTUS needs any more of those, and our country certainly doesn't need anymore folks like that in positions of high authority.
Senator Kyl, I guess two points. Let me commend you on For years this Court, faced with many opportunities to do so, left standing the legislation that is at issue in this case — first the contribution limits, then the expenditure limits that came in by way of Taft-Hartley — and then of course in Austin specifically approved those limits. Your headline is what he has been saying. After a late afternoon break, Kagan returned to the witness table.